REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Kriterion (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599 |
Resumo: | For a long time, the question of the existence of free will hasfueled philosophical debate with no definitive solution. Libet’s paradigm (1983) seemed to demonstrate that simple and apparently voluntary movements could be triggered not by consciousness, but by preconscious or random brain processes. Such findings had wide repercussions in the academic and scientific circles, triggering an extensive discussion among neuroscientists, philosophers and jurists. Exploring the interfaces between neuroscience and free will, the present work aims to formulate an updated synthesis of the diverse problematizations about the Libetian findings. It appears that Libet’s essay, although repeatedly analyzed and replicated in recent decades, still lacks a definitive interpretation, in part due to methodological controversies and specific conceptual shortcomings. The deepening of these investigations, combined with the new discoveriesoffered by neuroscience, can enrich research on free will in the coming years. |
id |
UFMG-10_07f6274722f53936fb173883ea9910c9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42599 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-10 |
network_name_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUEREVISITANDO O EXPERIMENTO DE LIBET: CONTRIBUIÇÕES ATUAIS DA NEUROCIÊNCIA PARA O PROBLEMA DO LIVRE-ARBÍTRIOLivre-arbítrioNeurociênciaParadigma de LibetFree willNeuroscienceLibet’s experimentFor a long time, the question of the existence of free will hasfueled philosophical debate with no definitive solution. Libet’s paradigm (1983) seemed to demonstrate that simple and apparently voluntary movements could be triggered not by consciousness, but by preconscious or random brain processes. Such findings had wide repercussions in the academic and scientific circles, triggering an extensive discussion among neuroscientists, philosophers and jurists. Exploring the interfaces between neuroscience and free will, the present work aims to formulate an updated synthesis of the diverse problematizations about the Libetian findings. It appears that Libet’s essay, although repeatedly analyzed and replicated in recent decades, still lacks a definitive interpretation, in part due to methodological controversies and specific conceptual shortcomings. The deepening of these investigations, combined with the new discoveriesoffered by neuroscience, can enrich research on free will in the coming years.Por muito tempo, a questão da existência do livre-arbítrio tem alimentado o debate filosófico sem solução definitiva. O paradigma de Libet (1983) pareceu demonstrar que movimentos simples e aparentemente voluntários poderiam ser desencadeados não pela consciência, mas por processos cerebrais pré-conscientes ou aleatórios. Tais achados repercutiram amplamente no meio acadêmico e científico, desencadeando extensa discussão entre neurocientistas, filósofos e juristas. Explorando as interfaces entre neurociência e livre-arbítrio, o presente trabalho objetiva formular uma síntese atualizada das diversas problematizações sobre os achados Libetianos. Constata-se que o ensaio de Libet, embora repetidamente analisado e replicado nas últimas décadas, ainda não possui uma interpretação definitiva, em parte devido a controvérsias metodológicas e deficiências conceituais específicas. O aprofundamento dessas investigações, aliado às novas descobertas oferecidas pela neurociência, pode enriquecer a pesquisa sobre o livre arbítrio nos próximos anos.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2023-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599/38783Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Andrade, Otávio Morato de Cardoso, Renato César2023-10-05T03:23:01Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42599Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:31.915304Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE REVISITANDO O EXPERIMENTO DE LIBET: CONTRIBUIÇÕES ATUAIS DA NEUROCIÊNCIA PARA O PROBLEMA DO LIVRE-ARBÍTRIO |
title |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE |
spellingShingle |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE Andrade, Otávio Morato de Livre-arbítrio Neurociência Paradigma de Libet Free will Neuroscience Libet’s experiment |
title_short |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE |
title_full |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE |
title_fullStr |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE |
title_full_unstemmed |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE |
title_sort |
REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE |
author |
Andrade, Otávio Morato de |
author_facet |
Andrade, Otávio Morato de Cardoso, Renato César |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cardoso, Renato César |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Otávio Morato de Cardoso, Renato César |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Livre-arbítrio Neurociência Paradigma de Libet Free will Neuroscience Libet’s experiment |
topic |
Livre-arbítrio Neurociência Paradigma de Libet Free will Neuroscience Libet’s experiment |
description |
For a long time, the question of the existence of free will hasfueled philosophical debate with no definitive solution. Libet’s paradigm (1983) seemed to demonstrate that simple and apparently voluntary movements could be triggered not by consciousness, but by preconscious or random brain processes. Such findings had wide repercussions in the academic and scientific circles, triggering an extensive discussion among neuroscientists, philosophers and jurists. Exploring the interfaces between neuroscience and free will, the present work aims to formulate an updated synthesis of the diverse problematizations about the Libetian findings. It appears that Libet’s essay, although repeatedly analyzed and replicated in recent decades, still lacks a definitive interpretation, in part due to methodological controversies and specific conceptual shortcomings. The deepening of these investigations, combined with the new discoveriesoffered by neuroscience, can enrich research on free will in the coming years. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599/38783 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023) Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023) Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023) 1981-5336 0100-512X reponame:Kriterion (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
collection |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakriterion@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799711183445426176 |