REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Otávio Morato de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Cardoso, Renato César
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599
Resumo: For a long time, the question of the existence of free will hasfueled philosophical debate with no definitive solution. Libet’s paradigm (1983) seemed to demonstrate that simple and apparently voluntary movements could be triggered not by consciousness, but by preconscious or random brain processes. Such findings had wide repercussions in the academic and scientific circles, triggering an extensive discussion among neuroscientists, philosophers and jurists. Exploring the interfaces between neuroscience and free will, the present work aims to formulate an updated synthesis of the diverse problematizations about the Libetian findings. It appears that Libet’s essay, although repeatedly analyzed and replicated in recent decades, still lacks a definitive interpretation, in part due to methodological controversies and specific conceptual shortcomings. The deepening of these investigations, combined with the new discoveriesoffered by neuroscience, can enrich research on free will in the coming years.
id UFMG-10_07f6274722f53936fb173883ea9910c9
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42599
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUEREVISITANDO O EXPERIMENTO DE LIBET: CONTRIBUIÇÕES ATUAIS DA NEUROCIÊNCIA PARA O PROBLEMA DO LIVRE-ARBÍTRIOLivre-arbítrioNeurociênciaParadigma de LibetFree willNeuroscienceLibet’s experimentFor a long time, the question of the existence of free will hasfueled philosophical debate with no definitive solution. Libet’s paradigm (1983) seemed to demonstrate that simple and apparently voluntary movements could be triggered not by consciousness, but by preconscious or random brain processes. Such findings had wide repercussions in the academic and scientific circles, triggering an extensive discussion among neuroscientists, philosophers and jurists. Exploring the interfaces between neuroscience and free will, the present work aims to formulate an updated synthesis of the diverse problematizations about the Libetian findings. It appears that Libet’s essay, although repeatedly analyzed and replicated in recent decades, still lacks a definitive interpretation, in part due to methodological controversies and specific conceptual shortcomings. The deepening of these investigations, combined with the new discoveriesoffered by neuroscience, can enrich research on free will in the coming years.Por muito tempo, a questão da existência do livre-arbítrio tem alimentado o debate filosófico sem solução definitiva. O paradigma de Libet (1983) pareceu demonstrar que movimentos simples e aparentemente voluntários poderiam ser desencadeados não pela consciência, mas por processos cerebrais pré-conscientes ou aleatórios. Tais achados repercutiram amplamente no meio acadêmico e científico, desencadeando extensa discussão entre neurocientistas, filósofos e juristas. Explorando as interfaces entre neurociência e livre-arbítrio, o presente trabalho objetiva formular uma síntese atualizada das diversas problematizações sobre os achados Libetianos. Constata-se que o ensaio de Libet, embora repetidamente analisado e replicado nas últimas décadas, ainda não possui uma interpretação definitiva, em parte devido a controvérsias metodológicas e deficiências conceituais específicas. O aprofundamento dessas investigações, aliado às novas descobertas oferecidas pela neurociência, pode enriquecer a pesquisa sobre o livre arbítrio nos próximos anos.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2023-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599/38783Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Andrade, Otávio Morato de Cardoso, Renato César2023-10-05T03:23:01Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42599Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:31.915304Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
REVISITANDO O EXPERIMENTO DE LIBET: CONTRIBUIÇÕES ATUAIS DA NEUROCIÊNCIA PARA O PROBLEMA DO LIVRE-ARBÍTRIO
title REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
spellingShingle REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
Andrade, Otávio Morato de
Livre-arbítrio
Neurociência
Paradigma de Libet
Free will
Neuroscience
Libet’s experiment
title_short REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
title_full REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
title_fullStr REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
title_full_unstemmed REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
title_sort REVISITING LIBET’S EXPERIMENT: CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEUROSCIENCE TO THE FREE-WILL ISSUE
author Andrade, Otávio Morato de
author_facet Andrade, Otávio Morato de
Cardoso, Renato César
author_role author
author2 Cardoso, Renato César
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Otávio Morato de
Cardoso, Renato César
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Livre-arbítrio
Neurociência
Paradigma de Libet
Free will
Neuroscience
Libet’s experiment
topic Livre-arbítrio
Neurociência
Paradigma de Libet
Free will
Neuroscience
Libet’s experiment
description For a long time, the question of the existence of free will hasfueled philosophical debate with no definitive solution. Libet’s paradigm (1983) seemed to demonstrate that simple and apparently voluntary movements could be triggered not by consciousness, but by preconscious or random brain processes. Such findings had wide repercussions in the academic and scientific circles, triggering an extensive discussion among neuroscientists, philosophers and jurists. Exploring the interfaces between neuroscience and free will, the present work aims to formulate an updated synthesis of the diverse problematizations about the Libetian findings. It appears that Libet’s essay, although repeatedly analyzed and replicated in recent decades, still lacks a definitive interpretation, in part due to methodological controversies and specific conceptual shortcomings. The deepening of these investigations, combined with the new discoveriesoffered by neuroscience, can enrich research on free will in the coming years.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/42599/38783
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711183445426176