Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Corrêa, Fabio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ziviani, Fabricio, Carvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres, Faria, Vinícius Figueiredo de, Parreiras, Fernando Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583
Resumo: Knowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research.
id UFMG-2_993e11ee314c17f8205eb01c167c1aec
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/37583
network_acronym_str UFMG-2
network_name_str Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge ManagementKnowledge management. Holistic paradigm. Holistic knowledge management. Content Validation. Measurement. Diagnosis.Gestão do ConhecimentoKnowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research.Perspectivas em Ciência da InformaçãoPerspectivas em Ciência da InformaçãoPerspectivas em Ciência da Informação2021-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2021)Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; Vol. 26 Núm. 4 (2021)Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; v. 26 n. 4 (2021)1981-53441413-9936reponame:Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583/29369Ciência da InformaçãoCopyright (c) 2021 Perspectivas em Ciência da Informaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorrêa, FabioZiviani, FabricioCarvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa FeresFaria, Vinícius Figueiredo de Parreiras, Fernando Silva2022-04-05T21:43:19Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/37583Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/oai||pci@eci.ufmg.br1981-53441413-9936opendoar:2022-04-05T21:43:19Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
title Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
spellingShingle Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
Corrêa, Fabio
Knowledge management. Holistic paradigm. Holistic knowledge management. Content Validation. Measurement. Diagnosis.
Gestão do Conhecimento
title_short Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
title_full Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
title_fullStr Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
title_full_unstemmed Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
title_sort Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
author Corrêa, Fabio
author_facet Corrêa, Fabio
Ziviani, Fabricio
Carvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres
Faria, Vinícius Figueiredo de
Parreiras, Fernando Silva
author_role author
author2 Ziviani, Fabricio
Carvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres
Faria, Vinícius Figueiredo de
Parreiras, Fernando Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Corrêa, Fabio
Ziviani, Fabricio
Carvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres
Faria, Vinícius Figueiredo de
Parreiras, Fernando Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Knowledge management. Holistic paradigm. Holistic knowledge management. Content Validation. Measurement. Diagnosis.
Gestão do Conhecimento
topic Knowledge management. Holistic paradigm. Holistic knowledge management. Content Validation. Measurement. Diagnosis.
Gestão do Conhecimento
description Knowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583/29369
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Ciência da Informação
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2021)
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; Vol. 26 Núm. 4 (2021)
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; v. 26 n. 4 (2021)
1981-5344
1413-9936
reponame:Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online)
collection Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||pci@eci.ufmg.br
_version_ 1799711078345605120