Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583 |
Resumo: | Knowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research. |
id |
UFMG-2_993e11ee314c17f8205eb01c167c1aec |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/37583 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-2 |
network_name_str |
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge ManagementKnowledge management. Holistic paradigm. Holistic knowledge management. Content Validation. Measurement. Diagnosis.Gestão do ConhecimentoKnowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research.Perspectivas em Ciência da InformaçãoPerspectivas em Ciência da InformaçãoPerspectivas em Ciência da Informação2021-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2021)Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; Vol. 26 Núm. 4 (2021)Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; v. 26 n. 4 (2021)1981-53441413-9936reponame:Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583/29369Ciência da InformaçãoCopyright (c) 2021 Perspectivas em Ciência da Informaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorrêa, FabioZiviani, FabricioCarvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa FeresFaria, Vinícius Figueiredo de Parreiras, Fernando Silva2022-04-05T21:43:19Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/37583Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/oai||pci@eci.ufmg.br1981-53441413-9936opendoar:2022-04-05T21:43:19Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management |
title |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management |
spellingShingle |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management Corrêa, Fabio Knowledge management. Holistic paradigm. Holistic knowledge management. Content Validation. Measurement. Diagnosis. Gestão do Conhecimento |
title_short |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management |
title_full |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management |
title_fullStr |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management |
title_full_unstemmed |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management |
title_sort |
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management |
author |
Corrêa, Fabio |
author_facet |
Corrêa, Fabio Ziviani, Fabricio Carvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Faria, Vinícius Figueiredo de Parreiras, Fernando Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ziviani, Fabricio Carvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Faria, Vinícius Figueiredo de Parreiras, Fernando Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Corrêa, Fabio Ziviani, Fabricio Carvalho, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Faria, Vinícius Figueiredo de Parreiras, Fernando Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Knowledge management. Holistic paradigm. Holistic knowledge management. Content Validation. Measurement. Diagnosis. Gestão do Conhecimento |
topic |
Knowledge management. Holistic paradigm. Holistic knowledge management. Content Validation. Measurement. Diagnosis. Gestão do Conhecimento |
description |
Knowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/37583/29369 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência da Informação |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2021) Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; Vol. 26 Núm. 4 (2021) Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação; v. 26 n. 4 (2021) 1981-5344 1413-9936 reponame:Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) |
collection |
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||pci@eci.ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1799711078345605120 |