Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/6875 |
Resumo: | Law 13.467/2017 and Act 808/2017 established the classification of moral harm in the labor courts and determined the criterion of the employee´s salary as the indemnity amount. Dispositions are, however, unconstitutional since they are against the basic right to equality, besides segregating people. The casuistic analysis of the extension of the harm is impaired and it is an offense towards the access of justice and to the constitutional model of the democratic process. It privileges judicial initiative to the detriment of the rights of the parties involved in the suit to construct discursively a final solution. Access to justice is a right which is concretized when the parties may participate in the construction of the process and their allegations and proofs are rationally analyzed by the judge. The theme is justified due to its modernity, practical and theoretical relevance. Through bibliographical and documental research, one may identify aporias, build critical analyses and show that the proposal to label moral harm in labor justice is an offense to material equality, access to justice and to the constitutional model of the process. |
id |
UNICESU-0_792ba7f4391a4a54c913236744cedaa4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6875 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional ProcessLa Fijación Del Daño Moral En La Justicia Del Trabajo: Un Análisis Crítico Bajo La Ótica Del Acceso A La Justicia Y Del Proceso Constitucional DemocráticoO Tabelamento do Dano Moral na Justiça do Trabalho: Uma Análise Crítica sob a Ótica do Acesso à Justiça e do Processo Constitucional Democrático Access to justiceMoral harmLabor JusticeLaw 13.467/2017 and Provisional Act 808/2017Democratic Constitutional ProcessAcceso a la JusticiaDaño MoralJusticia del TrabajoLey 13.467/2017 y Medida Provisional 808/2017Proceso Constitucional DemocráticoAcesso à JustiçaDano MoralJustiça do TrabalhoLei 13.467/2017 e Medida Provisória 808/2017Processo Constitucional Democrático.Law 13.467/2017 and Act 808/2017 established the classification of moral harm in the labor courts and determined the criterion of the employee´s salary as the indemnity amount. Dispositions are, however, unconstitutional since they are against the basic right to equality, besides segregating people. The casuistic analysis of the extension of the harm is impaired and it is an offense towards the access of justice and to the constitutional model of the democratic process. It privileges judicial initiative to the detriment of the rights of the parties involved in the suit to construct discursively a final solution. Access to justice is a right which is concretized when the parties may participate in the construction of the process and their allegations and proofs are rationally analyzed by the judge. The theme is justified due to its modernity, practical and theoretical relevance. Through bibliographical and documental research, one may identify aporias, build critical analyses and show that the proposal to label moral harm in labor justice is an offense to material equality, access to justice and to the constitutional model of the process. La Ley 13.467/2017 y Medida Provisional 808/2017 instituyeron la fijación del daño moral en la justicia del trabajo, estableciendo como criterio do quantum indemnizatorio el sueldo del empleado. Tales disposiciones legislativas son materialmente inconstitucionales, pues ofenden del derecho fundamental a la igualdad material, además de segregar y cosificar personas. Se impide el análisis casuístico de la extensión del daño, constituyendo ofensa al acceso a la justicia y al modelo constitucional de proceso democrático. Se privilegia el protagonismo judicial en detrimento del derecho de las partes involucradas en la lide construir discursivamente la destinación final. El acceso a la justicia es un derecho que se efectiva cuando las partes pueden participar de la construcción del mérito procesual, teniendo sus alegaciones y pruebas racionalmente analizadas por el juzgador. La elección del tema se justifica por su actualidad, relevancia práctica y teórica, pues por intermedio de las investigaciones bibliográfica y documental fue posible identificar aporías, construir análisis críticos y demonstrar que la propuesta de tarifación del daño moral en la justicia del trabajo constituye ofensa à igualdad material, acceso a la justicia y modelo constitucional del proceso.A Lei 13.467/2017 e Medida Provisória 808/2017 instituíram o tabelamento do dano moral na justiça do trabalho, estabelecendo como critério do quantum indenizatório o salário do empregado. Tais disposições legislativas são materialmente inconstitucionais, pois ofendem do direito fundamental à igualdade material, além de segregar e coisificar pessoas. Impede-se a análise casuística da extensão do dano, constituindo ofensa ao acesso à justiça e ao modelo constitucional de processo democrático. Privilegia-se o protagonismo judicial em detrimento do direito de as partes envolvidas na lide construírem discursivamente o provimento final. O acesso à justiça é um direito que se efetiva quando as partes podem participar da construção do mérito processual, tendo suas alegações e provas racionalmente analisadas pelo julgador. A escolha do tema justifica-se em razão de sua atualidade, relevância prática e teórica, pois por meio das pesquisas bibliográfica e documental foi possível identificar aporias, construir análises críticas e demonstrar que a proposta de tarifação do dano moral na justiça do trabalho constitui ofensa à igualdade material, acesso à justiça e modelo constitucional do processo.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2021-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPESQUISA BIBLIOGRÁFICA E DOCUMENTALapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/687510.17765/2176-9184.2021v21n1p173-190Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 21 n. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 173-1902176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/6875/6643Costa, Fabricio Veiga Batista, Tadeu Saint´Clair Cardoso Machado, Julia Alves Almeida info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-06-30T20:23:24Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6875Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-06-30T20:23:24Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process La Fijación Del Daño Moral En La Justicia Del Trabajo: Un Análisis Crítico Bajo La Ótica Del Acceso A La Justicia Y Del Proceso Constitucional Democrático O Tabelamento do Dano Moral na Justiça do Trabalho: Uma Análise Crítica sob a Ótica do Acesso à Justiça e do Processo Constitucional Democrático |
title |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process |
spellingShingle |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process Costa, Fabricio Veiga Access to justice Moral harm Labor Justice Law 13.467/2017 and Provisional Act 808/2017 Democratic Constitutional Process Acceso a la Justicia Daño Moral Justicia del Trabajo Ley 13.467/2017 y Medida Provisional 808/2017 Proceso Constitucional Democrático Acesso à Justiça Dano Moral Justiça do Trabalho Lei 13.467/2017 e Medida Provisória 808/2017 Processo Constitucional Democrático . |
title_short |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process |
title_full |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process |
title_fullStr |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process |
title_sort |
Classification of Moral Harm in Labor Courts: A Critical Analysis from the Point of View of Accessing Justice and the Democratic Constitutional Process |
author |
Costa, Fabricio Veiga |
author_facet |
Costa, Fabricio Veiga Batista, Tadeu Saint´Clair Cardoso Machado, Julia Alves Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Batista, Tadeu Saint´Clair Cardoso Machado, Julia Alves Almeida |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Fabricio Veiga Batista, Tadeu Saint´Clair Cardoso Machado, Julia Alves Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Access to justice Moral harm Labor Justice Law 13.467/2017 and Provisional Act 808/2017 Democratic Constitutional Process Acceso a la Justicia Daño Moral Justicia del Trabajo Ley 13.467/2017 y Medida Provisional 808/2017 Proceso Constitucional Democrático Acesso à Justiça Dano Moral Justiça do Trabalho Lei 13.467/2017 e Medida Provisória 808/2017 Processo Constitucional Democrático . |
topic |
Access to justice Moral harm Labor Justice Law 13.467/2017 and Provisional Act 808/2017 Democratic Constitutional Process Acceso a la Justicia Daño Moral Justicia del Trabajo Ley 13.467/2017 y Medida Provisional 808/2017 Proceso Constitucional Democrático Acesso à Justiça Dano Moral Justiça do Trabalho Lei 13.467/2017 e Medida Provisória 808/2017 Processo Constitucional Democrático . |
description |
Law 13.467/2017 and Act 808/2017 established the classification of moral harm in the labor courts and determined the criterion of the employee´s salary as the indemnity amount. Dispositions are, however, unconstitutional since they are against the basic right to equality, besides segregating people. The casuistic analysis of the extension of the harm is impaired and it is an offense towards the access of justice and to the constitutional model of the democratic process. It privileges judicial initiative to the detriment of the rights of the parties involved in the suit to construct discursively a final solution. Access to justice is a right which is concretized when the parties may participate in the construction of the process and their allegations and proofs are rationally analyzed by the judge. The theme is justified due to its modernity, practical and theoretical relevance. Through bibliographical and documental research, one may identify aporias, build critical analyses and show that the proposal to label moral harm in labor justice is an offense to material equality, access to justice and to the constitutional model of the process. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares PESQUISA BIBLIOGRÁFICA E DOCUMENTAL |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/6875 10.17765/2176-9184.2021v21n1p173-190 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/6875 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2021v21n1p173-190 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/6875/6643 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 21 n. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 173-190 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798042387915735040 |