The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vasconcellos, Erica Tex
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bortoluzzi, Valeria Iensen
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/916
Resumo: This paper presents the analysis of seven essays that received maximum score in the National Examination of High School in accordance with Systemic Functional Linguistics, proposed by Halliday (1982), Martin e Rose (2008) e Rose e Martin (2012). The purpose of the study was to verify the lexical-grammatical elements used in the argumentative proposal of the 1000 graded essays in the year 2014, with the aim of describing the genre. The research is characterized by being a documentary analysis based on semantic-discursive analysis of the seven selected texts for research. This analysis helps in understand about the linguistic resources used for the student to convince the examining board about the proposal and how these resources produces texts from the Arguments family. The analyzed samples presented typical stages of the Exposition and Discussion genres, according the Sydney School, demonstrating that the context of the test requires the students to present other points of view besides arguments that support their opinion.
id UNIFEI_fd6071169d61c855f8b4bda1185db9f2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/916
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspectiveLa redacción del Examen Nacional de la Enseñanza Media en la perspectiva de la Lingüística Sistémico-FuncionalA redação do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio na perspectiva da Linguística Sistêmico-FuncionalENEM essaysSystemic-Functional LinguisticsDiscoursive genre.Redação do ENEMLinguística Sistêmico-FuncionalGênero discursivo.Redacción del ENEMLinguística Sistémico-FuncionalGénero discursivo.This paper presents the analysis of seven essays that received maximum score in the National Examination of High School in accordance with Systemic Functional Linguistics, proposed by Halliday (1982), Martin e Rose (2008) e Rose e Martin (2012). The purpose of the study was to verify the lexical-grammatical elements used in the argumentative proposal of the 1000 graded essays in the year 2014, with the aim of describing the genre. The research is characterized by being a documentary analysis based on semantic-discursive analysis of the seven selected texts for research. This analysis helps in understand about the linguistic resources used for the student to convince the examining board about the proposal and how these resources produces texts from the Arguments family. The analyzed samples presented typical stages of the Exposition and Discussion genres, according the Sydney School, demonstrating that the context of the test requires the students to present other points of view besides arguments that support their opinion.Este artículo presenta el análisis de siete redacciones nota 1000 del Examen Nacional de la Enseñanza Media a la luz de la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional. El propósito del estudio fue verificar los elementos léxico-gramaticales utilizados en la propuesta argumentativa de las redacciones nota 1000 en el año 2014, para fines de descripción del género. La investigación se caracteriza por ser de análisis documental, con base en análisis semántico-discursivo de los siete textos seleccionados para la investigación. Este análisis ayuda en la comprensión de recursos lingüísticos utilizados por el alumno para convencer a la banca acerca de la propuesta dada y cómo esos recursos engendran textos de la familia de los Argumentos. Los ejemplares analizados presentaron estadios típicos de los géneros Exposición y Discusión, según lo descrito por la Escuela de Sydney, demostrando que el contexto de la prueba exige de los estudiantes la presentación de otros puntos de vista además de argumentos que sustenten su opinión.Este artigo apresenta a análise de sete redações nota 1000 do Exame Nacional do Ensino médio à luz da Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional. O propósito do estudo foi verificar os elementos léxico-gramaticais utilizados na proposta argumentativa das redações nota 1000 no ano de 2014, para fins de descrição do gênero. A pesquisa caracteriza-se por ser de análise documental, com base em análise semântico-discursiva dos sete textos selecionados para a pesquisa. Tal análise ajuda na compreensão de recursos linguísticos utilizados pelo o aluno para convencer a banca acerca da proposta dada e como esses recursos engendram textos da família dos Argumentos. Os exemplares analisados apresentaram estágios típicos dos gêneros Exposição e Discussão, conforme descritos pela Escola de Sydney, demonstrando que o contexto da prova exige dos estudantes a apresentação de outros pontos de vista além de argumentos que sustentem a sua opinião.Research, Society and Development2019-02-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/91610.33448/rsd-v8i4.916Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 4; e1884916Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 4; e1884916Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 4; e18849162525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/916/761Copyright (c) 2019 Valeria Iensen Bortoluzzi, Erica Tex Vasconcellosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasconcellos, Erica TexBortoluzzi, Valeria Iensen2020-03-25T16:07:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/916Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:09.976357Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective
La redacción del Examen Nacional de la Enseñanza Media en la perspectiva de la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional
A redação do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio na perspectiva da Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional
title The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective
spellingShingle The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective
Vasconcellos, Erica Tex
ENEM essays
Systemic-Functional Linguistics
Discoursive genre.
Redação do ENEM
Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional
Gênero discursivo.
Redacción del ENEM
Linguística Sistémico-Funcional
Género discursivo.
title_short The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective
title_full The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective
title_fullStr The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective
title_full_unstemmed The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective
title_sort The National High School Examination essay according to the Systemic Functional Linguistics perspective
author Vasconcellos, Erica Tex
author_facet Vasconcellos, Erica Tex
Bortoluzzi, Valeria Iensen
author_role author
author2 Bortoluzzi, Valeria Iensen
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vasconcellos, Erica Tex
Bortoluzzi, Valeria Iensen
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ENEM essays
Systemic-Functional Linguistics
Discoursive genre.
Redação do ENEM
Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional
Gênero discursivo.
Redacción del ENEM
Linguística Sistémico-Funcional
Género discursivo.
topic ENEM essays
Systemic-Functional Linguistics
Discoursive genre.
Redação do ENEM
Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional
Gênero discursivo.
Redacción del ENEM
Linguística Sistémico-Funcional
Género discursivo.
description This paper presents the analysis of seven essays that received maximum score in the National Examination of High School in accordance with Systemic Functional Linguistics, proposed by Halliday (1982), Martin e Rose (2008) e Rose e Martin (2012). The purpose of the study was to verify the lexical-grammatical elements used in the argumentative proposal of the 1000 graded essays in the year 2014, with the aim of describing the genre. The research is characterized by being a documentary analysis based on semantic-discursive analysis of the seven selected texts for research. This analysis helps in understand about the linguistic resources used for the student to convince the examining board about the proposal and how these resources produces texts from the Arguments family. The analyzed samples presented typical stages of the Exposition and Discussion genres, according the Sydney School, demonstrating that the context of the test requires the students to present other points of view besides arguments that support their opinion.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/916
10.33448/rsd-v8i4.916
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/916
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v8i4.916
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/916/761
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Valeria Iensen Bortoluzzi, Erica Tex Vasconcellos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Valeria Iensen Bortoluzzi, Erica Tex Vasconcellos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 4; e1884916
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 4; e1884916
Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 4; e1884916
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052642827960320

Registros relacionados